Mirena is a form of birth control that was introduced in 2000. It is long-lasting and used as an intrauterine device (IUD), which is manufactured by Bayer Healthcare. The device is implanted into the uterus and is intended to prevent pregnancy for up to five years. However, in some incidents, women, who have had this device implanted, suffered severe and debilitating injuries when the IUD spontaneously moved from its original implantation location, puncturing the uterus and causing various internal injuries.
The first trial for the lawsuit against Mirena IUD (intrauterine device) will begin in March 2016. There have been hundreds of Mirena IUD lawsuits filed all across the United States and the U.S. District Judge presiding over these cases has set up a schedule that states that the first trial will begin in March 2016.
When Bayer Healthcare first introduced the Mirena IUD in 2000, it promoted the IUD as a hassle-free form of birth control. Women however, started complaining to their doctors and it was determined that some of the IUD’s migrated from the initial implant site, perforating the uterus and other organs, causing major infections and abscesses, and leaving women unknowingly unprotected against the chance of pregnancy.
Bayer Healthcare now faces more than 2,000 product liability lawsuits nationwide. All the lawsuits involve similar allegations that the manufacturer failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of injuries associated with side effects of Mirena IUD use.
Since Mirena was introduced, there have been more than 70,000 adverse events filed with the FDA, all which involve the Mirena IUD problems. 500 of the cases involved women who claimed that the Mirena IUD moved out of place since 2008 and 1,322 reported that the Mirena IUD punctured their uterus.
Bayer, however has attempted to defend their case by saying that the risk of perforation was included on the warning labels provided. Plaintiffs and women affected, however, claim that that warnings are/were vague, misleading and suggested that the risk of injury only existed at the time of insertion.
600 of the 2,000 lawsuits, all considered part of an MDI, or multidistrict litigation, have been assigned to U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in the Southern District of New York. Judge Seibel issued a scheduling order on July 29, 2014, and it states that the first federal trial is expected to begin on March 7, 2014. Similar claims have been brought up in New Jersey and will be heard by Judge Martinotti.